About 116 minutes
The Scottish History of James the Fourth 1598 — A Reader’s Guide
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
26,598 recorded words. 7 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #43668This digital edition of Women for votes — Story, Setting & Ideas is described by source-level measurements including 28,280 words, 2 hr 3 min estimated reading time, and 6 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 13.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Women -- Suffrage -- Drama,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 116 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
26,598 recorded words. 7 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #43668About 105 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
24,082 recorded words. 18 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #12988About 102 minutes
Adventure Picaresque Fiction
23,442 recorded words. 21 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #53513Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 90 public books, 90 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
The play opens in the Tilsburys' drawing room, where a full-length portrait of the first Mrs. Tilsbury hangs above a sofa—a silent witness to the domestic and political sparring below. Mrs. Brown, cradling her pet pig Cochon, contrasts sharply with Mrs. Tilsbury, who arrives from a suffrage meeting brimming with reported horrors. The dialogue immediately establishes a pattern: serious claims are undercut by absurd non sequiturs, as when Mrs. Brown asks if women could testify about pets' pedigrees. This oscillation between earnestness and farce persists throughout Act I.
The stage directions specify a tastefully arranged room with doors at each end, suggesting a space of entrances and exits that mirrors the characters' shifting allegiances. The portrait of the first Mrs. Tilsbury, described as beautiful and full-length, hangs over the sofa—a constant reminder of a predecessor whose absence shapes the household. Mrs. Tilsbury's hat and Mrs. Brown's dinner dress signal their different priorities: one rushing from activism, the other already settled into leisure. The pig Cochon, asleep on the floor, becomes a prop that deflates high-minded talk, as when Mrs. Brown interrupts a discussion of legal rights to coo at her pet. This juxtaposition of the serious and the trivial recurs, with bridge prizes and servant gossip competing with suffrage petitions.
Mrs. Thom, the suffrage leader, delivers pointed barbs with surgical precision. When Mr. Van Tousel hesitates to sign a petition, she asks if the desk is "a purely ornamental piece of furniture," and later dismisses his mother's anti-suffrage stance by invoking "different wives, different roofs." Her language is direct and confrontational, likening opponents to "dogs in the manger." In contrast, Mrs. Brown's asides—"She talks like a dentist"—provide deflating commentary. The exchanges are rapid, with characters interrupting and pivoting from politics to personal jabs. Mr. Becker's quip about bonds and scissors shows how even supporters of the cause can be skewered. The play's humor relies on these swift shifts, where a petition signing becomes a test of manhood and a widow's residence a subject of satire.
Several objects and images recur, linking scenes and characters. The pig Cochon appears in Act I as a living accessory, and Mrs. Brown's question about testifying on pets' pedigrees echoes later when Mrs. Thom demands signatures. Bridge prizes—"some old thing that go from house to house as rapidly as a servant girl"—mirror the circulation of arguments and accusations. The portrait of the first Mrs. Tilsbury remains a silent presence, its gaze perhaps judging the second Mrs. Tilsbury's activism. Even the petition itself is a physical object rolled and pocketed, a prop that moves between characters. These recurring elements give the farce a structural coherence, as trivial items gain symbolic weight through repetition.
The play's three acts likely trace a trajectory from private drawing-room debates to public activism. In Act I, the action is confined to the Tilsbury home, with characters arriving and departing through the two doors. The mention of Mildred returning exhausted from carrying a banner hints at offstage suffrage activities. The contrast between Mrs. Tilsbury's reluctant involvement and Mrs. Thom's militant zeal sets up potential conflicts. The farce format allows for rapid entrances and exits, as when Sophie ushers Mr. Van Tousel to his seat, blending domestic and political spheres. The movement from interior to exterior—from the parlor to the street—is suggested but not shown in the excerpts, leaving the full arc of the play to be discovered.
Readers should attend to how the play uses its farcical structure to stage genuine disagreements about women's suffrage without resolving them neatly. The recurring props—the pig, the portrait, the petition—are not mere decorations but active participants in the debate. Notice how characters' positions shift when they are cornered, and how the play balances satire of both anti-suffrage and pro-suffrage positions. The incomplete excerpts leave the third act unknown, but the patterns established in Acts I and II suggest a finale that may upend expectations.
Rereading Women for Votes, I found myself thinking of the stage’s longer echo, how every character is a mask worn by history. The Tilsbury household’s quarrels felt like whispers from old playbills. That’s when I remembered "Their Majesties' Servants." Annals of the English Stage (Volume 3 of 3) — A Reader’s Guide, a quiet companion for such lingering afternoons.
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.