About 474 minutes
Webster & Tourneur — Edition Insights
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
108,833 recorded words. 64 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #55625The source record for A Select Collection of Old English Plays, Volume 07 — Text and Context measures this digital text at 123,696 words, 8 hr 58 min estimated reading time, and 14 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 15.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English drama,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 474 minutes
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
108,833 recorded words. 64 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #55625About 439 minutes
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
100,778 recorded words. 99 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46312About 286 minutes
Fantasy Juvenile Worlds
65,575 recorded words. 252 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #44645Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 90 public books, 90 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
The five plays in this volume—ranging from the 1560s collaborative tragedy Tancred and Gismund to the 1590s comedy Look About You—display markedly different authorial strategies in diction, dialogue, and dramatic structure. The editors note that Tancred and Gismund was originally written by gentlemen of the Inner Temple, then 'newly revived and polished according to the decorum of these days' by R. Wilmot, a revision that altered its linguistic texture. In contrast, The Two Angry Women of Abington (printed 1599) employs colloquial, rapid-fire exchanges, as when Mall Barnes retorts to her mother: 'Hasty, mother! why, how old am I?' Such lines reveal how playwrights calibrated speech to character and social rank.
The volume’s tragic pieces, like Tancred and Gismund, favor formal, Latinate diction and balanced rhetorical periods. Gismunda’s plea—'But in thy brest if eny spark remaine / Of thy dere love'—employs courtly address and conditional syntax. By contrast, the comedies adopt a lower, more idiomatic register. In The Two Angry Women of Abington, Mall Barnes declares: 'For maids that wear cork shoes may step awry,' a proverb-like line that blends homely imagery with sexual innuendo. The juxtaposition of these registers within a single volume highlights how Elizabethan dramatists matched language to genre and audience expectation.
Dialogue in these plays often serves to expose character through verbal tics and argumentative patterns. In The Two Angry Women, Mrs. Barnes’s anger erupts in a string of epithets—'Mistress Flirt—yea, foul strumpet, / Light-a-love, short-heels!'—the accumulation of insults revealing her jealous fury. Her son Philip responds with measured appeals: 'O my dear mother, have some patience!' This contrast between impulsive and restrained speech defines their relationship. Similarly, in Tancred and Gismund, Gismunda’s elaborate pleas for mercy from her father Tancred build tension through formal supplication, her controlled diction masking desperate emotion.
The plays differ in their structural debts. The editors observe that Tancred and Gismund 'was formed on a classical model, and bears marks of resemblance in tone and style to the “Jocasta” of Euripides.' This influence appears in its five-act division, stichomythic exchanges, and use of a chorus. In contrast, The Two Angry Women follows a more episodic, popular structure, with scenes shifting rapidly between domestic interiors and outdoor settings. The stage direction 'Enter MRS BARNES' after Mall’s soliloquy creates a comic juxtaposition of private fantasy and maternal authority. Such structural variety within one collection illustrates the range of dramatic conventions available to late-16th-century playwrights.
Small recurring details anchor the plays in material life. In The Two Angry Women, Mrs. Barnes demands of her son: 'Where's your blue coat, your sword and buckler, sir?'—a reference to the livery of a serving-man, signaling both social status and maternal anxiety about his companions. Mall’s mention of 'cork shoes' evokes contemporary fashion and its association with unsteady morals. In Tancred and Gismund, the repeated motif of 'brest' (breast) as the seat of love and memory—'in thy brest if eny spark remaine'—ties emotion to physical anatomy. These details, drawn from domestic and courtly spheres, ground the plays in recognizable social codes.
Readers approaching this volume will benefit from attending to the editorial apparatus: the introduction to Tancred and Gismund collates manuscript variants, revealing how Wilmot revised the original 1568 text. Comparing the Lansdowne and Hargrave manuscripts with the printed 1591 version offers a case study in authorial and editorial intervention. The comedies, less documented, reward close reading of their stage business and verbal play. This collection thus serves not only as a repository of plays but as a window into the collaborative, revisionary processes that shaped early English drama.
Reading the old plays’ clashing voices, I remembered sitting with my grandfather’s leather-bound set, his pencil marks in the margins of Tancred. He’d whisper how even grief sounded staged. Later, a friend passed me The Group: A Farce — Context and Discussion, and I felt that same ache—how words meant to wound sometimes land merely as noise.
A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.